Court was established as the guardian of the law. The purpose of his business was to resolve cases involving serious crimes. Minor incidents of the past were solved at local gatherings led usually by a territorial law enforcement authorities. Today, unfortunately, misses the judiciary from its original purpose. It became the scene of battles with the proverbial "pear in between". Instead, the heaviest weight to settle the case as murder, scandal, and all kinds of abuse, today's judiciary deals with things, to put it mildly, "grotesque." It takes time and effort to be spent on really important matters for the internal order in the country.
We remember how in times of "Republic of Nobles" (IRP) elite voluntarily fell victim to be financially costly and ongoing processes of year. Huge fortunes have been lost in vain for "putting on their own. Rather than settle the dispute with the proverbial "pear on between" himself, as befits an honest man, two years fools preferred to solve it before the courts. Lost their fortunes at the same time allowing them to buy a whole orchard. Dogodzenia anger and a desire to own pride as a result led many to bankruptcy. weaken our country from measure, and was one factor in the decline of the IRP. similar stupidity is taking place even today. It destroys the country from within, fostering divisions in the nation, as well as taking valuable time course of justice, which could be used it to solve many scandals. This trend, if not stopped, may in future lead to the collapse of our country, just as I Republic ...
Recently we deal with a wave of court hearings przezwania because someone from "Debila" or "agent." Normal person, sane, in this case would solve the case himself. Named "retard", odpłaciłby the same. And the end of the matter. So much it is worth it! If I were called the "agent", wyjaśniłbym publicly that it is a lie. I would convene a conference or published relevant literature on this topic. End. So much is it worth? Personally, because of various insults, which were used against me, I'd have to bring at least 50 processes. But they never do, because I'm a man thinking, and I would not mind zakrzątać justice such stupidities. There are also guided by a desire to arise in the media, because I do not need to dowartościowywać. Modern "gruszkomiedzowcy" but apparently felt the need for case applies. They run the court like spoiled brats, who want to complain to mom that they were dubbed. thus affront to the seriousness of the institution, because the processes it with the guards of the "mommy" (to which you can complain about the slightest problem.) A time ago Wojciech Cejrowski * rightly called the ruling political environment "chłoptasiami" . "Gruszkomiedzowcy" are a typical example of a "spoiled chłoptasiów," who in contrast to the mature men, can not solve problems by the need to complain, "Mommy." Part of the blame for this situation lies with the legal system, which makes treatment of the court as the proverbial "mother". What is needed is the thorough reform, which prohibits the settlement of disputes with any nonsense the courts. In this light, the courts only rozstrzygałyby serious crimes. Trivia, the solution of which can occupy more than an hour, would be dealt with Territorial tribunals run by local law enforcement, . Such a reform is needed to the state. allow legal authorities to concentrate more on the fight against street gangs and groups wszelakimi conducting criminal activities. Currently, a number of processes serious criminals, harming the country's internal order, are often blocked by the flood of hearings on the proverbial "pears in between." After the reform of the law stops crime prevail in the majesty of law and justice will be unloaded from the process unworthy of solving the courts. Stop "court-mommy!"
also need a nation-wide opposition to the political process, based on false allegations by the influential circles such as the homosexual lobby or Jewish. often are based on false accusations of alleged "hate speech", because of the criticism of the actions of these environments. by the court loses its seriousness and credibility, and become an institution przyzwalającą the vilification of people whose support is in the interest actually state. expression of negative opinion, based on evidence about homosexuals, or activities of the Jewish, the finish is treated as "hate speech", even though there is no word on the use of violence against these groups. This mechanism is selective. Indeed saturated with hatred against the enemies of homosexuality, whether such nations like the Poles, Germans, French or the Russians pass unnoticed, in the absence of any consequences. What some have to be treated partly exempted and others not? In light of such practice should be litigation all historians! In every book or textbook for history are nevertheless described the crimes committed during wars and conquests. In light of the practices can also be read as "hate speech." Such trends over time would lead to total the ban on teaching history, because as an object would be a breeding ground for hate speech. "Then would come to this, that we would not know their own history. It would be a spiritual being killed every man. better solution is to promote historicism free from pressure of any lobbyists. criticism should concern every because no man is God. This paradox demoliberalnego country should be ended as soon as possible. It led to the absurd today, spitting permission for governments and heads of state, while the treatment of certain social groups as "sacred cows". Stop to do with the court a tool of "political correctness"! Sadowne Stop the destruction of people based on unfounded allegations! It also offends the dignity of this institution.
competence of the court should be part of issues with the most severe crimes such as murder, betrayal, scandal, theft, prostitution, trafficking in prohibited goods, defamation Polish culture, the destruction of Polish Tradition. such crimes by their nature, would be listed in the records, which would delimited for accuracy. the circle of court must be off the little things that do not require even a hearing, as the name-calling, a puncture, the dispute between the drum, the bad words about someone. Such trifles must be addressed individually. When the dispute is becoming the bane of the local community, then you would put mediator, drawn from law enforcement bodies of territorial as local police and representatives of local authorities . This matter would be resolved in no more than an hour. Place its solution should be not a court, but Territorial Court (TT) . The penalties would be substantially disciplinary , including restitution of property stolen , cover the cost of property damaged or redemption , apology, community work or . Such cases would not be listed in the directory homepage. Would be traded only in the archives of the TT. Littering a record of grotesque positions, "he called someone a retard," or "raised the tire angry neighbor" would be comical. Such a reform of the judicial system is essential for the proper and smooth functioning of the state. Justice will more effectively fight the real threats to the internal order of the country, as it will be relieved from the enormity of the hearings about the small stuff.
the traditionalist point of view should be to consent to resolve the feud between the individual on the road "duel". still ongoing fight duels of honor, by the court to prosecute parties participating in them, is a perversion of our traditional customs. Speech Here, of course, the so-called. "przylaniu in the mouth" . Combating these are the traditional and the best way to resolve matters relating to the violation of someone's dignity or holiness. court to prosecution of persons engaged in the struggle to defend their dignity should not have happened. Fights and should be conducted between a prejudicial a victim, without risk to health and life of participants in a duel, and not grind the top down is not a third party. At the time of any breach of these rules, it should be just the start procedure for punishing offenders rules. The loser of the duel would have been defeated, not only physically but morally.
reform the judicial system would eliminate many regulatory pathology. For example, I heard in a court for theft of 8 gold man sentenced to 8 years in prison, while involved in the famous "affair Starachowice" as a powerful financial embezzlement were given minor sentences ranging from 1.5 to 2.5 years in jail! It's absurd and lack of justice in an institution to be the repository! Penalties for the theft of small amounts should include their return, in case of inability to pay them by the accused, must be working off. Big economic scandals should be settled only by asking a court. Personally I think that prison sentences for financial crimes is stupid. Criminals who carry out the theft should make up for what they stole, without burdening taxpayers with additional grants to keep thieves.
making people think vetting is unacceptable. Especially when doing it in the context of their work. Adjudication of "agenturalności" falls within the competence of experts in this field, namely: the historians, journalists, political and historical, and politicians. Im here to be the "palm of priority." Their work must be based on source, otherwise, unjustifiably slandered others, and they will be losing their own credibility. If a person decides to name her "agent" for unjust, then the matter should be corrected publicly , either in writing or conference. Of course, in this case must also provide evidence of their "purity". When someone but will not be able to prove their "innocence", confirms the thesis of "agenturalności", and thus has no right to sue the people who fought for the truth. Nobody has impede the right of the people in the fair exercise of their profession. Particularly reprehensible are cases where it is believed the historian's ruling publicly about "agenturalności" a certain person, while the same attitude of acquiescence, not mającemu authority in this field, the artist. This is a situation paradoxical. Once an attack on the proper performance of work by the historian. Two attackers and condones a certain impunity and outlawry. Pathologies must be fought for the proper functioning of the state.
I do not have enough knowledge to great "as the authority on the subject" rule on "agenturalności" or "no-agenturalności" of public figures. But I'm vetting supporter, provided that it will be conducted by authorized persons. I will not be recognized as a credible vetting carried out in the halls, festivals and concerts. lustration is necessary for the proper functioning of the Polish State. However, it must be conducted fairly and factually. Hence there can be appropriated in the private interest of a party that by pinning patch "agent" will do the vetting of an excuse to eliminate people uncomfortable. vetting should include cooperation with all the secret services, detrimental to the Polish State. Thus, not only should we pursue secret collaborators SB, KGB, GRU or BND, but also agents CIA, Mossad , or other services related to Western countries.
* Wojciech Cejrowski used the term "chłoptasie" in relation to the OP team. It was one of the TVP affairs programs. I do not remember where. Generally I agree with his theses. I do not agree, however, his delight the U.S. and the local economic system, which presented the relationship, not once.
The National greeting,
Piotr Marek
